<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A different kind of straddle with etf&#8217;s?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.yhuang.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=126" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.yhuang.org/?p=126</link>
	<description>here.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 11:10:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: me</title>
		<link>https://blog.yhuang.org/?p=126&#038;cpage=1#comment-58546</link>
		<dc:creator>me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 06:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scripts.mit.edu/~zong/wpress/?p=126#comment-58546</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t do much trading, although I did simulate as well as try this for a few months earlier last year, before this post.

It sort of worked. The downside insurance certainly worked for a while, but the inverse ETF&#039;s bled too much and it&#039;s totally opaque why. What I mean is, they really don&#039;t track their respective indexes very well.

The other practical issue is when to enter and exit these strategies. That is never clear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t do much trading, although I did simulate as well as try this for a few months earlier last year, before this post.</p>
<p>It sort of worked. The downside insurance certainly worked for a while, but the inverse ETF&#8217;s bled too much and it&#8217;s totally opaque why. What I mean is, they really don&#8217;t track their respective indexes very well.</p>
<p>The other practical issue is when to enter and exit these strategies. That is never clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob A. Hartop</title>
		<link>https://blog.yhuang.org/?p=126&#038;cpage=1#comment-58523</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob A. Hartop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 02:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scripts.mit.edu/~zong/wpress/?p=126#comment-58523</guid>
		<description>Very nice thought experiment. I had been pondering the very same strategy and found your post after searching google. 

I&#039;ve been developing a simple spreadsheet to simulate EXACTLY these principles--and specifically the scenario involving only small movements in the market.

Do you trade ETFs personally?

Rob Hartop</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice thought experiment. I had been pondering the very same strategy and found your post after searching google. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been developing a simple spreadsheet to simulate EXACTLY these principles&#8211;and specifically the scenario involving only small movements in the market.</p>
<p>Do you trade ETFs personally?</p>
<p>Rob Hartop</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
