<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Some stuff &#187; equilbrium</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.yhuang.org/?feed=rss2&#038;tag=equilbrium" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.yhuang.org</link>
	<description>here.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2025 08:50:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>some science</title>
		<link>https://blog.yhuang.org/?p=260</link>
		<comments>https://blog.yhuang.org/?p=260#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 23:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black body radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equilbrium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internal reflection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law of thermodynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[light bulbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opposite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scripts.mit.edu/~zong/wpress/?p=260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Big bang an exploding white hole, opposite of a black hole? (paper) This sounds interesting and somehow satisfying. LED light bulbs coming, but incandescents being phased out by mandate in January, 2012? What?! Time to stockpile bulbs. I like my black-body radiation. Speaking of black-body radiation, suppose I have an enclosed system with a single [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/04/100406172648.htm">Big bang an exploding white hole, opposite of a black hole?</a> (<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2010.03.029">paper</a>) This sounds interesting and somehow satisfying.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.smartplanet.com/business/blog/smart-takes/ge-energys-smart-led-light-bulb-promises-17-years-of-service-nine-watt-draw/5830/">LED light bulbs coming</a>, but incandescents being phased out by mandate in January, 2012? <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Independence_and_Security_Act_of_2007#Incandescent_lights">What?!</a> Time to stockpile bulbs. I like my black-body radiation.</p>
<p>Speaking of black-body radiation, suppose I have an enclosed system with a single aperture for light and only light to pass through. Do I now have a system for converting heat to light, and therefore to electricity via bandgaps? Doesn&#8217;t that violate some law of thermodynamics?<br />
<span id="more-260"></span><br />
Okay, I guess the temperature of the photovoltaic converter (the heat sink) matters also, since photons incident on it need to find a site where the electron is in a low-energy state, so unless the converter is at absolute zero, there is some probability the photon will not be captured, which becomes waste heat.</p>
<p>Now what if we enclose the photovoltaic converter, too, so photons cannot escape? That won&#8217;t work, either, since at thermal equilbrium, the converter radiates as many photons as it captures, so no voltage develops. The converter just becomes hotter.</p>
<p>But wait, if the converter&#8217;s temperature rises above that of the radiating source, doesn&#8217;t that imply that the enclosed converter receives some kind of energy, even if it isn&#8217;t converted to electricity? Doesn&#8217;t that also violate a law of thermodynamics? Ah, but the radiating source and the converter are in optical contact. That must mean that no passive one-way optical material can exist, in which one side is totally opaque and absorptive and another side is totally transparent and reflective. Sounds like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirchhoff's_law_of_thermal_radiation">Kirchhoff&#8217;s law</a>&#8230;</p>
<p>Yet, there are transparent optical interfaces that use total internal reflection on one side to achieve exactly this one-way effect, is there not? Okay, the optics also radiate, so no free lunch here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://blog.yhuang.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=260</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
