<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Some stuff &#187; hydra project</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.yhuang.org/?feed=rss2&#038;tag=hydra-project" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.yhuang.org</link>
	<description>here.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2025 08:50:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>quad-core processor</title>
		<link>https://blog.yhuang.org/?p=26</link>
		<comments>https://blog.yhuang.org/?p=26#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 06:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[huh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydra project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[level]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[level parallelism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thread level]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scripts.mit.edu/~zong/wpress/?p=26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Already here in a Dell? That didn&#8217;t take long, did it. True, it doesn&#8217;t take much to replicate 2 cores to 4, but huh, Intel is really not letting up on AMD. Intel is promising an 80-core teraflop processor within 5 years, with cache stack-intereconnected, or perhaps with optical interconnects. Hardware is moving fast these [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.gadgetell.com/2006/11/dell-stuffs-a-dual-core-chip-into-xps-710/">Already here</a> in a Dell? That didn&#8217;t take long, did it. True, it doesn&#8217;t take much to replicate 2 cores to 4, but huh, Intel is really not letting up on AMD. Intel is promising an 80-core teraflop processor within 5 years, with cache stack-intereconnected, or perhaps with optical interconnects. Hardware is moving fast these days. Too bad compilers aren&#8217;t doing too well in extracting thread level parallelism yet. They had better catch up soon or they&#8217;d be the next bottleneck.</p>
<p>Chip multiprocessors have definitely caught on, realizing the predictions of the <a href="http://www-hydra.stanford.edu/hydra.shtml">Hydra project</a> from some years back. Come to think of it, I was pretty close to going into computer architecture&#8230; for old time&#8217;s sake, here&#8217;s a <a href="http://ogun.stanford.edu/~kunle/publications/queue05.pdf">nice review</a> from Olukotun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://blog.yhuang.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=26</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
