<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Some stuff &#187; Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.yhuang.org/?feed=rss2&#038;tag=media" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.yhuang.org</link>
	<description>here.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2025 08:50:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>written in the snow</title>
		<link>https://blog.yhuang.org/?p=300</link>
		<comments>https://blog.yhuang.org/?p=300#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ames street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[butt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media lab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sentence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allegro.mit.edu/~zong/wpress/?p=300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After last week&#8217;s snow, this appeared near the new Media Lab building (Amherst Street near Ames Street): &#8220;CAL (butt-print) MIT&#8221; I think it&#8217;s a sentence&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After last week&#8217;s snow, this appeared near the new Media Lab building (Amherst Street near Ames Street):</p>
<p><img src="wp-content/uploads/images/calXmit.jpg" width="600" /></p>
<p>&#8220;CAL (butt-print) MIT&#8221;</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s a sentence&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://blog.yhuang.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=300</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>good, bad, and ugly of windows 7</title>
		<link>https://blog.yhuang.org/?p=216</link>
		<comments>https://blog.yhuang.org/?p=216#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 02:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chinese handwriting recognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[critical threshold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keyboard input]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new task bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stream]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows media center]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scripts.mit.edu/~zong/wpress/?p=216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I went ahead and installed it. Windows 7 is compelling, but still, it has been overhyped. Good: I get the impression that most reviews became enamored with the new task bar, which, while compelling and does save a lot of time, is not entirely critical to me. If the tablet functions of Vista were its [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went ahead and installed it. Windows 7 is compelling, but still, it has been overhyped.
<p>Good: </p>
<ol>
<li>I get the impression that most reviews became enamored with the new task bar, which, while compelling and does save a lot of time, is not entirely critical to me.
<li>If the tablet functions of Vista were its only must-have features, then the alternate input improvements are the key selling points of Windows 7 for me. Here we have much improved Chinese handwriting recognition and speech recognition (in particular, dictation) in multiple languages. These have passed the critical threshold of being useable and indeed I can say they are <em>better</em> than keyboard input. That is no small feat.
<li>Math input panel, as mentioned previously, is not quite up to par yet, but I can see a lot of potential. While it is faster than typing straight LaTeX, it is not faster than LyX. But for labeling figures, this is perhaps useful.
<li>PowerShell, i.e. Monad, is beautiful.
<li>The volume controller has been restored to usefulness, with audio loopback for devices now possible.
<li>Libraries could be a very useful feature, but seems to be lacking <em>something</em> that helps ease their management.</li>
<li>Per-file versioning (from system restore) should be very helpful.</li>
</ol>
<p>Bad:</p>
<p><span id="more-216"></span></p>
<ol>
<li>Windows Media Player 12 is a piece of crap and a step backwards. It supposedly can stream media to another machine, but this comes at the cost of a fragmented UI, losing the “Now Playing” auto-playlist, and losing the Advanced Tag Editor.
<li>The old Sound Recorder is still gone, as it was in Vista. Its replacement is still a piece of crap.
<li>Kerberos integrated logon doesn’t work any more. This isn’t a strictly OS issue, I suppose.
<li>Lack of serious support for single-touch input. You’d think there would be at least something to help with zooming and scrolling, but no…   Alternatively, at least a virtual driver could be written that combined multiple input devices to simulate the effect (touch + pen, or pen + mouse).
<li>Windows Media Center: still stagnating at the stage of focusing on over-the-air TV. The internet stream offerings are poor and unimaginative.
<li>Not fast(er than Vista) in starting anything, I’m almost certain of that. However, it is very fast in (visually) shutting down programs, which, as an obvious UI illusion, beggars belief for only being implemented now.</li>
</ol>
<p>Ugly:</p>
<ol>
<li>With the exception of the task bar, most UI elements have gotten uglier.
<li>The start menu is butt ugly. Look at the search box and the shutdown button (on the left), as compared to Vista (on the right). I don’t know what these UI designers were thinking.</li>
</ol>
<table border=0>
<tr>
<td>
<img src="wp-content/uploads/images/windows-7-start-menu-with-run-command.png" alt="http://www.blogsdna.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/windows-7-start-menu-with-run-command.png"> </td>
<td><img src="wp-content/uploads/images/350px-vista_start_menu.png" alt="http://www.macvswindows.com/images/thumb/e/e0/vista_start_menu.png/350px-vista_start_menu.png"></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>Speaking of old systems, look at this circa 2000. It starts and shuts down in tens of seconds and uses 42MB of memory when the system is unloaded. 42MB!</p>
<p><embed allowscriptaccess="never" height=384 width=454 src=http://d.yimg.com/static.video.yahoo.com/yep/YV_YEP.swf?id=16270861&amp;vid=6269908 autostart="false" loop="false"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://blog.yhuang.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=216</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>how to get NVTV tuner to work with MCE</title>
		<link>https://blog.yhuang.org/?p=83</link>
		<comments>https://blog.yhuang.org/?p=83#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 01:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hibernation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mce 2005]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media center edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NVTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tuner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows media center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows media center edition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scripts.mit.edu/~zong/wpress/?p=83</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This tuner card kind of sucks, but it is supposed to work with Windows Media Center Edition 2005. It doesn&#8217;t work out of the box, though. The way to get it to work is to install the following: The driver, version 1.20.45, from nVidia Forceware Multimedia 3.62 from XFX (with these two, the card will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.xfxforce.com/web/product/listConfigurationDetails.jspa?productConfigurationId=1026">This tuner card</a> kind of sucks, but it is supposed to work with Windows Media Center Edition 2005.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t work out of the box, though. The way to get it to work is to install the following:</p>
<ol>
<li>The <a href="http://www.nvidia.com/object/nvtv_winxp_mc_1.20.45.html">driver</a>, version 1.20.45, from nVidia</li>
<li><a href="https://www.dropbox.com/s/9y37i0gd1l44xpr/forceware_362.iso" title="originally at ftp://xfxsupport.com/public/utility/Forceware_Media_3.62.zip">Forceware Multimedia 3.62</a> from XFX (with these two, the card will work with nVidia provided applications)</li>
<li>April 2006 <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/914548">update</a> for MCE 2005 Rollup 2 (that makes the card work under MCE)</li>
</ol>
<p>It still craps out occasionally, but it works. Image quality is pretty good.</p>
<p><i>Edit:</i> Wow, a couple of days playing with MCE made me realize that PC&#8217;s these days can be woken from <b>hibernation</b> on schedule <b>programmatically</b> &#8212; that&#8217;s right, hibernation, not standby, and that&#8217;s right, by software, not via wake-on-hardware. I wonder how that happens&#8230; I gotta try this on an older PC now to see if it works there, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://blog.yhuang.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=83</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
